This week, the leaders of Somalia and the self-declared Republic of Somaliland held talks in Djibouti to discuss the future of their relationship.
Somaliland is a former British protectorate, and joined Italian Somaliland in 1960 a few days after gaining independence from Britain to form the Somali Republic. In 1991, it declared independence from Somalia when the last effective central government in Mogadishu collapsed. Although it fulfilled key conditions for statehood, no country recognises Somaliland as an independent nation.
Relations between the two remain tense. International actors are leading efforts to revive dialogue between the two sides, Djibouti being the latest.
To avoid any kind of confrontation, the two sides should adopt the ‘one country, two systems’ model.
There should be one Somalia, but Somaliland should be allowed to retain its own economic and political systems, but under the sovereignty of Somalia. It should continue to have its own governmental system, legal, economic and financial affairs, including trade relations with foreign countries, all of which are independent from those of Somalia, but the government in Mogadishu maintains control over Somaliland’s foreign affairs and defence.
The ‘one country, two systems’ will give Somaliland a high degree of autonomy; it will have its separate way of governance and independent legal systems, its own police force, central bank, while being part of Somalia, but under the sovereignty of Mogadishu.
Somaliland has its own police, military, currency, holds presidential elections regularly, and its political system is different from the rest of Somalia. The ‘one country, two systems’ is already in place. Hargeisa needs to relinquish foreign affairs and defence to Mogadishu, and the two sides should reach an agreement to formalise this. Source link
Note: The opinions expressed in this article are not shared by the editorial board of https://www.somalilandsun.com
You are right not to publish because the article is a total nonsense. That useless professor cannot tell a sovereign nation with whom to engage. That is simply patronising and condescending altitude only a white man would think of. Good riddance, he is retired! We don’t need his advice. It for us as a country to decide who we would like to develop engagement with and how we maintain it, if we decide to engage.
Why should your online paper publish an article, if the editorial does not share the the opinion expressed by the article. You can’t have your cake and eat it.
And why not and FYI all the items we publish do not necessarily bear the board’s thinking on that particular issue.
On the other hand what is freedom of expression